Risks : Agreeing to be injected with a product that is officially experimental is, of course, an informed personal choice. Even the director of the famous and prestigious British Medical Journal, Peter Doshi, thinks that this injection does not fall under the classical definition of a vaccine, and that it is therefore a "gene therapy". The effectiveness over time has not yet been proven, only time will tell. The risk of COVID19 vaccination has three aspects :

In the U.S. military, military doctors have already expressed concerns for the safety of personnel, arguing, that already many more U.S. servicemen have died shortly after the injections than from Covid-19 itself.

It should be noted here that the products currently available are all still subject to conditional marketing authorization until at least the end of 2022. Of the four original manufacturers, three (Astra-Zeneca, Johnson & Johnson, and Moderna) are banned for people under 30. To date, two of them have been withdrawn from the market for the entire French population.

The truth of this epidemic is much more complex than a simple vaccine solution put forward, in March 2020, and pre-sold by the pharmaceutical industry. A whole part of the population, via its T lymphocytes, has an innate humoral immunity against this disease, and seems not to be able to be touched. The natural immunity against this disease (for the primo-infected) is very robust (higher than 99.6% in all serious studies, which no vaccine will ever reach), and durable in time. Studies have shown that 17 years after the episode of SARS-CoV-1, the patients of that time still had antibodies in the blood. This is, how we achieve herd-immunity, naturally.

The mRNA technology is attractive and innovative because it allows our cellular machine to produce molecules in large quantities. It is therefore up to us to know which molecule is produced by our body in the context of a vaccine. These injections force the body to become an advanced protein factory, called Spike, for about two weeks. But this « Spike Protein », like any pharmakon, can be a remedy but also a poison, because it mechanically creates micro-clots in the blood; this is why some scientists, accused of being opposed to the COVID-19 vaccination, say : We are not « anti-vax », we are « anti-Spike ».

Many recent studies have demonstrated the toxicity of this Spike protein. It is a characteristic element of the SARS-COV2 virus, and it causes considerable damage to the body as evidenced by the pathological signs of this disease (blood clots, stroke, inflammation of the myocardial muscle, attack of the blood vessel wall). During the mRNA injection, the Spike protein is produced in big quantity by the person's own body, without being weakened or rendered harmless, as in a conventional vaccine. On the contrary, its toxicity is one of the main reasons for the numerous adverse reactions recorded by official pharmacovigilance organizations.

Here, we unroll Covid-19 vaccine mortality figures as of mid-October 2021, from major global pharmacovigilance sites :

A very complete article from France-Soir, summarizes this problem well. If the official figures of deaths, linked to the COVID vaccine are impressive, those of the undesirable effects are even more so, because they affect the youngest and our health in the long term. There is, therefore, a major medical risk of loss of licenses as a result of the « COVID vaccine ». Peter McCullough, a renowned cardiologist with an H-index of 118, a giant of American academic medicine, rings the alarm and denounces the « medical nihilism » of our management of the Covid-19 crisis.

Finally, in a VAERS study, we see that the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis increase significantly with the number of doses, and, in particular, for younger men.

We have not yet discussed the long-term risks of these injections of genetic material (like cancers, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, etc.), but their unknown character needs to be added to the balance, as Dr. Gérard Delépine, an oncologist, reminds us in an article in nouveau-monde.ca.

Benefits : Debates are raging about whether hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin work; the best thing to do is to read a recent article, in Le Point, where we can only observe that the AP-HM (Marseille Hospitals) got away with a mortality rate 3.5 times lower than that of the AP-HP (Paris Hospitals), over a period of one and a half years, here is an extract&bnsp;:

Here, we provide two sites where full meta-analyses of the two known early treatments can be found :

The results are clear. These treatments are simple, inexpensive, and very effective.

Risks : Both hydroxychloroquine, prescribed in tens of billions of tablets for more than 70 years, and ivermectin, for which the Japanese professor Satoshi Omura received the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2015, have shown their safety, especially when, given for a short week, while these molecules are otherwise used for long-term treatments (rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, river blindness, etc). In summary, and since the flight crew members all benefit from regular ECG monitoring of their heart, the risk of taking these molecules, only in case of proven symptoms of the disease, is nil.